Wednesday, 28 December 2011

QE II Slogans continued ... Happy New Year !

Finally, to bring the year to an end, here are the last Bath National slogan cancels I have before the introduction of decimal postage.  The first cancel "Remember to use the Postcode" was very early, being in 1968, the first postcodes being issued in Norwich.  It wasn't until 1971 that postcodes were put into general use and people started to get informed of what their postcode was.

These are also the first two National slogan cancels I've shown that are in transformed format - the town cancel is over the stamp while the slogan is in the middle of the envelope.  Local publicity slogans had been in the Transposed position since 1963 (more on this next year !).

Sunday, 25 December 2011

QE II Slogans continued ... Charities

From 1959 Charity appeals appear as slogan cancels.
This first one, for World Refugee Year was rapidly withdrawn - if the stamp was (in-)correctly placed one got an unfortunate image of the Queen with her hand to her face.

Saturday, 24 December 2011

Wincanton under Shaftesbury 5th Clause Post

Bruton, Castle Cary and Wincanton were under the Shaftesbury 5th Clause Post, which was set up in 1823.  Bruton and Castle Cary were also in the Shepton Mallet 5th Clause Post, mail going northward via Shepton Mallet while mail for London and the south went via Shaftesbury.

The following two sheets show that Wincanton, unlike Bruton and Castle Cary, was very unlikely to have been in the Shepton Mallet 5th Clause Post.

Both sheets contain entires from Wincanton to Wells, the first in 1824 and the second in 1829, both with postage charges of 10d from Wincanton to Wells, being made up of 1d in the 5th Clause Post from Wincanton to Shaftesbury plus 9d in the General Post (from Shaftesbury to Salisbury, Bath and to Wells being about 85 miles).  If the post had gone via Shepton Mallet the charge would only have been 1d for the 5th Clause Post plus 4d in the General Post (from Shepton Mallet to Wells being six miles) or 5d in total.
 

Happy Christmas

From my collection of items associated with the Mulready cover, here's a facsimile in red that was posted as a Christmas card.  The message inside was from W.V. Morten, a former postal worker.  Very little is known about W.V. Morten himself, other than his complete devotion to the postal service, studying and collecting things on every aspect.

Wednesday, 21 December 2011

Sunday, 18 December 2011

QE II Slogans continued ... Civil Defence

Up until 1957 a text-only slogan was used, albeit in slightly different forms.  From 1958 a pictorial slogan was used.
For future reference, note how crisp and readable the slogan cancels are !

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

How did the early post messenger system work ?

I’ve read in a number of books about how in England postmasters used to be under contract to the Crown to provide horses for post messengers, or to provide messengers & horses, to move mail along the post roads. They also had a monopoly on the provision of horses for people who wanted to "ride post", ie. journey along the post roads.

How did the postmasters get their horses back if they provided horses ? Who looked after the horses (eg. feed & stabling) when the messenger had finished the stage (normally 15 to 20 miles) and got a fresh horse from the next postmaster ?

What did the messenger do when he’d handed the mail over to the next messenger ? Did he just set off back to where he came from or did he wait for a post coming the other way ? If so where did he stay, who paid for his meal (& his horse’s feed & stabling) ?

Was all of this covered in the contract that the postmaster signed, and if so what were the details ? Have any contracts survived ?

One possibility is that the horses for the post messengers were basically pooled - that the postmasters took a horse in and provided a fresh one, so that they did not keep ownership of specific horses - if so that seems a recipe for the provision of cheap (& not necessarily good) horses.

The provision of horses for people who wanted to ride post would have to have been handled differently. There were standard rates for the provision of such horses, eg. 3d a mile, with mention of a separate rate for a guide (4d per stage). Was a guide obligatory, so that they could be responsible for bringing the horses back after they had been used for a stage and changed at the next post ?

Any answers gratefully received !

QE II Slogans continued ... Christmas

To begin with the same Christmas Slogan cancel was used, but in 1960 a new pictorial cancel was introduced.

Sunday, 11 December 2011

QE II Slogans continued ...

A couple of campaigns firstly to get people to use the correct address (this was before the introduction of the Post Code which happened after october 1965.  The second sheet is trying to get people to buy stamps in booklets.

Wednesday, 7 December 2011

National Slogans - Queen Elizabeth II

In the early part of Queen Elizabeth's reign, the use of slogan cancellations continued as before - for national campaigns, postal matters, and for national exhibitions.
Here is a long running campaign to get people to register for the voter's list, followed by a shorter-term one to get people to use the correct postage to Europe after the postal rates had gone up.

Monday, 5 December 2011

More on Castle Cary charges

According to "A List of Post-Towns and Principal Places with the Postage of a Single Letter to or from London according to the Actual Routes of the Post" published for His Majesty's Stationery Office in 1830, the postage in the General Post from London to Castle Cary should be as follows (see scans below):
  • To Castle Carey          9d  (in italics which I take to mean that Castle Carey was not a Post Town)
  • To Shaftesbury            9d
  • To Shepton Mallet     10d
  • To Wincanton              9d  (The post road moved so that Wincanton became a Post Town in 1830 and took over the 5th Clause Post instead of from Shaftesbury)
This indicates that at least by 1830 the correct postal rate in my previous post should have been 9d - so why were some letters charged 10d between the middle of 1825 and 1827 ?  If you have any examples of letters from London to Castle Cary in this period (1824 to 1830) please let me know what they were charged.

    Saturday, 3 December 2011

    Castle Cary inhabitants overcharged for their Post ?

    Just to stop any campaigns for reimbursement, this was in the 1820s.

    First some background.  In the early 1820s Castle Cary became part of two 5th Clause Posts, one from Shaftesbury (for mail from the south and London) and one from Shepton Mallet (for mail to the north.
    The map above shows the route for the mail that came via Shaftesbury which is the route that this relates to.

    A 5th Clause Post was so-called because it was enacted in the 5th clause of the Act of George III, Cap. VII in 1801, and allowed the Post Office greater flexibility in setting charges to cover the expense of establishing local posts. The postal charge for the local post could be set by agreement or 'convention' with the local inhabitants, who agreed to cover any deficiency between the revenue coming in from the local post and the costs going out.

    I've been reading up about this in the Somerset & Dorset Postal History Group Journal, where there is a whole article about the intricacies of the post and the different handstamps.  I then found another article about the Castle Cary Penny Post handstamp, which seems to have been used sparingly between 1824 and 1827 (just after the 5th Clause Posts had been set up).  This second article had details of 5 entires with this Penny Post handstamp - including the postage charges.

    All the entires were from London, the postal rates did not change over the period, so you would expect the charges to be the same (or double or triple for double or treble letters).  Well, they weren't. The table below shows the details of the entires, with the postal charge in the right-hand column.

    Date
    Other marks
    From
    To
    Charge
    25.11.1824
    "No.2"
    London
    Ditcheat
    1/6d  (double)
    early 1825
    "No.2"
    London
    Ansford
    9d
    24.6.1825
    "No.2"
    London
     Castle Cary
    (Mr Mathews)
    10d
    20.5.1826
    "No.2"
    London
    Ditcheat
    1/8d
    5.3.1827
    "No.2"
    London
    Ditcheat
    1/8d

    OK, so what should it cost ?

    One would expect the mail coming from London to come to Shaftesbury in the General Post, and the charge for that is what you'd expect to see on the front of the entires.  Shaftesbury was deemed to be 104 miles from London (it had a mileage handstamp "Shaftesbury / 104").  Between 1812 and December 1829 the rate for 80-120 miles was 9d. so that is what one would have expected to see.  The London postal clerks would not know any details of local postal matters like the 5th Clause Post so there wouldn't be any charge for that included.  It would be up to the Castle Cary Receiving House to get the money for the postage from the recipient, and they would demand the extra 1d for the 5th Clause Post then.

    The first two entires in the table above show this postage charge, 9d for a single letter and 1/6d for a double letter (one with two sheets of paper).

    Alternatively, it is possible that a letter could have gone from London to Shepton Mallet and then to Castle Cary via the Shepton Mallet Fifth Clause Post.  Shepton Mallet was 135 miles from London so would have incurred a 10d. (120-170 miles) charge (or 1/8d. for a double letter).

    The remaining three examples have been given a 10d. General Post charge (or 1/8d. for a double letter).  This was not a total charge that included the Fifth Clause Post because the double letter charge was double the single letter one (and the Fifth Clause 1d. did not double with the number of sheets).  This is compatible with a route via Shepton Mallet.

    So, did the post route to Castle Cary change from via Shaftesbury to via Shepton Mallet ?  Or did perhaps the time of day a letter was posted determine which mail coach was used ?  If this was the case the inhabitants of Castle Cary were at the mercy of the Post Office as to what they got charged for a letter.

    My second thought on looking at the postal rates is that there is alternative explanation for the higher charges seen on the later three entires, that it was due to human error.

    It appears that before the 5th Clause Posts were introduced that Castle Cary was a Post Town, and based on its mileage handstamp was deemed to be 145 miles from London.  The postal rate for 120-170 miles was 10d. and this appears to be what the last three entires were charged (or 1/8d. for a double letter).  Did the London Post Office clerks for the later entires remember Castle Cary at 145 miles from London, and calculate the charge should be 10d. ?  ... rather than looking up Shaftesbury and doing the first calculation ?

    The other markings on the entires (the "No.2" cancel) show that the entires did come via the 5th Clause Post. So one must assume that the Receiving House demanded a further 1d. for the 5th Clause Post.

    Thus out of a sample of 5 entires, 3 (60%) look like they were charged more than they could have been, by 1d. or 2d, perhaps because they went the long way, via Shepton Mallet, or just perhaps because a Post Office clerk was working the charge out based on old postal routes.

    Wednesday, 30 November 2011

    Christmas present

    Well that's my Christmas present sorted out - "Masters of the Post: The Authorized History" by Duncan Campbell-Smith, RRP £30 but available at a significant discount from Amazon. Here is a link to a short video on the book from the Amazon website.

    Sunday, 27 November 2011

    Wells Penny Post

    Two wrappers sent in the Wells Penny Post, with Receiving House marks - a framed "No.16" and an unframed "No.17".  These are likely to originally be from the Bristol Penny Post.  Oxley assigns "No.16" to Oakhill.  Chew Magna had "No.43" from 1830-33 but was then given "No.17" which it had from 1834-1840 (source - "Bristol 5th Clause & Penny Posts 1793-1840" by Ian Warn). So "No.17" is likely to be Chew Magna.   From 1818 a number of Receiving Houses, including these, were under Bristol, Bath and Wells, ie. they could sent mail to whichever Post Town, depending on where it was addressed.
    Below is a map of the Wells Penny Post, taken from an article in the S&DPHG Journal:

    Wednesday, 23 November 2011

    Wedding and Coronation

    The wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh in 1947 was an occasion of national and worldwide interest, commemorated by a country-wide slogan cancel.
    This was followed in June 1953 by the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II, after the death of her father, King George VI on 6th February 1952.

    Sunday, 20 November 2011

    Wednesday, 9 November 2011

    Sunday, 6 November 2011

    Post WW II Slogans

    The post-war slogans continued in the same vein as between the wars ... Post Early for Christmas:

    Wednesday, 2 November 2011

    Slogans during WW II

    Slogans were abandoned for the duration of WW II except for a few patriotic exhortations.

    Monday, 31 October 2011

    Bridgewater Penny Post

    An example of an early Penny Post from Bridgewater (at this time the name was spelled with an 'e' in the middle), with a large boxed "No.1" cancel from the Receiving House in Stowey.

    Sunday, 30 October 2011

    "British Goods are Best", "Road Users Take Care, Avoid Risks"

    Cancels in the National Interest were also used.  This first sheet has examples of "British Goods Are Best" from 1925 to 1927.

    Road Safety was also in the public eye.  The 30 mph speed limit in built-up areas was introduced in 1935.  After this road fatalities fell from 7,343 to 6,502.  However they crept up again to 8,609 per year which prompted the safety campaign illustrated below.

    Friday, 28 October 2011

    List of Post Offices in Somerset, Dorset & Bristol

    With the kind permission of Ken Smith, I've put his lists of Post Offices for Somerset, Dorset and Bristol up on the web page for the S&DPHG (links are at the top right of the page). 

    The lists are in PDF format so should (?) display and print out OK - please use the Enquiry form on the web page to let me know of any problems.

    Please also use the Enquiry form to let me know of any errors or changes so I can feed them back to Ken.  Please give details/evidence of why things need to be changed so I can pass that on too.

    Wednesday, 26 October 2011

    "Say It By Telephone", "Its Quicker To Telephone"

    The Post Office was also responsible for Telephony, so were not adverse to moving the public away from Mail to the Phone.






    Tuesday, 25 October 2011

    Somerset & Dorset Postal History Group

    I've just attended the October meeting of the Somerset & Dorset Postal History Group at Hornsbury Mill, Chard (having managed to persuade my wife to tag a couple of days on to a holiday in Cornwall and North Devon).

    It was a very interesting day, with two 90-sheet displays on Parliamentary Mail and on Destination Mail from Bristol, plus about a dozen 9-12 sheet displays from the members attending on a variety of subjects (mainly but not exclusively Somerset or Dorset related).

    Lunch was very good too !

    As a result of the meeting I've started putting up a website for the Group - which has already generated one enquiry.

    I took along a few sheets, mainly with questions, including the sheet below that I've already posted to this blog.
    The general opinion was that this was an "illegal" 2d charge where the Penny Post had been increased to Two Pence by the Post Office, but which then had to be reduced to 1d when challenged in the courts.

    Sunday, 23 October 2011

    "Post Early ..."

    It was three years after the end of WW I that the Post Office allowed slogan cancels again, confined to matters relevant to the postal services or which highlighted important national events.

    Post Early for Christmas:  note the change in format for the later cancels, with the bars either side of "FOR" being omitted.
    Post Early in the Day:  continuing campaign to get the public to adopt practices that made it easier for the Post Office.
    The Post Office also produced a leaflet: